Tweeti wasnt wondering...i think i've known the answer to that for awhile
TweetI was watching Mike Wallace this morning and Obama's transition team's manager was on their saying some of the first things Obama was going to do was go through Bush's executive orders and decide whether he want's to completely undue them, just amend them or leave them alone. One he mentioned by name though that Obama is opposed to, is the Executive Order that lifted the domestic drilling ban. (interesting for those wondering if he's going to rule as a pragmatist or an liberal ideologue.)
Tweeti wasnt wondering...i think i've known the answer to that for awhile
HE WHO MAKES A BEAST OF HIMSELF, GET'S RID OF THE PAIN OF BEING A MAN!!
https://www.infinitymuscle.com/forum.php
"Actually for once your actually starting sound quite logical!"-djdiggler 07/10/2007
I LOVE BOOBOOKITTY...
Tweetpragmatist, people are there actions, that is how he runs his life and ran his campaign
barrell of oil has come down 90 bucks in 3 months
he's opposed to it because the influence on having an Energy Policy, which has not been worked out
he's not opposed to oil, coal, or nuclear
they are trying to figure out how too go forward to reach a goal, and it's affects 5-10-20 and fifty years down the road on jobs, economic growth, security, etc.
it is not an easy problem when you take into account now versus time
Tweet
Really so when he restores the ban, he's not going to justify it with the "delicate ecosystem", "save the caribou" or some other b.s. environmentalist dogma? Betcha he does!!
TweetNo Klash,
It has to do with what is the best guess the world will look like in 50 years.
A. Worlwide we should have 9 billion people versus 6 billion, that is pretty much factual
B. What will the energy needs be for 9 billion and what is the best way too meet them, we know factually about what the needs will be
C. we do not know in what %'s from what commodities they will be met
Tweetthat is a F U C K I N G lie, and you know it! You saw the comments he made about bankrupting the coal industry...hows that good for the economy...all he cares about his his bs treehugger liberal bull s hit...not the good of the people...that will put 500,000 to 750,000 people out of work.
TweetAre we projecting? I've never heard him say anything like.
TweetCorrect. He already has enough people in committee to stop it.
TweetWell, to be hopeful, it also depends on how influencial he is and by whom he's receptive. Unfortunately though, he's proven receptive to some pretty extreme, uh uhm, radical leftist.