Obama is shockingly pro-war

[straydoglogic]

TweetWASHINGTON - Following President Obama's "end of our combat mission" speech, Libertarian Party chairman Mark Hinkle released this statement:

"President Obama needs to stop lying. In his speech, he repeated the ridiculous and false claim that the U.S. combat mission is over in Iraq. He seems to think that if he keeps talking about the war in a nice way, then the war isn't really happening.

"Unfortunately, even though President Obama is the one person on Earth with the authority to withdraw the U.S. military from Iraq, he has chosen instead to keep over 50,000 troops there, risking their lives, and bleeding American taxpayers.

"The Republicans in Congress are just as bad. They have consistently failed to own up to the terrible financial impact of these wars, all the while claiming that they want to cut government. They want to nit-pick Obama's past statements about the war, but in fact they should be showering him with praise for doing exactly what they want.

"This war has been a shameful failure from the beginning. But even if the U.S. military could impose a sustainable modern democracy on Iraq, it would in no way be worth the hundreds of billions of dollars, and thousands of American lives, lost in the process. The Bush-Obama War in Iraq has done nothing to safeguard the rights of Americans -- on the contrary, it has probably made Americans less safe, and certainly poorer.

"The purpose of the U.S. armed forces is to defend the territory of the United States, not to re-engineer foreign societies.

"Contrary to his rhetoric before being elected, the president has proven himself to be shockingly pro-war. In addition to sustaining the American war presence in Iraq, he has greatly escalated the War in Afghanistan. Just like his predecessor, Obama believes that government force is the answer to everything."

The Libertarian Party platform states under "3.3 International Affairs": "American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid."

[horsepwr]

Tweet"shockingly"...nah. Think about his roots. His Muslim background. War is all those folks know. The boys don't grow up chasing tail. They can't even communicate with the females. Even if one happened to want to talk to a chic, how the hell do you approach someone you can't even see. Dressed like the grim reaper. So, bring on the battle. They are a war lovin bunch. conflict. Hell, muslims kill other muslims in the name of Islam. Our mighty president grew up with that horseshit deep seated in his mind. Muslim heritage. Keep it goin.

[FUZO]

Tweetstray when will you recognize that there will always be war and soldiers will be killed.This wont be the last time we have a war

[JsJs24]

TweetIt will never end. What I don't like is that the guy said even if we did build a sustainable democracy......., and that is what kills me. Why would we want to build a democracy, instead of a republic which we are? I don't think many people know the difference and I don't suspect that will change. I have this argument all the time and the rebuttals are always the same, that we are a democratic republic. How about we are a Constitutional Republic. But what's it matter anyway considering most don't even know what a Republic is, or a democracy for that matter.

Other than that, good read.