• Join Us!
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Join Us!

  • Get the Fitness Geared Forum App Now!
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets


  • Join Us!
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
  • Join Us!
  • You have 1 new Private Message Attention Guest, if you are not a member of Fitness Geared - Body Building & Fitness Community, you have 1 new private message waiting, to view it you must fill out this form.
  • Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • Depressed
  • Down
  • Drunk
  • Embarrased
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • Geeky
  • Godly
  • Happy
  • Hateful
  • Hungry
  • Innocent
  • Meh
  • Piratey
  • Poorly
  • Sad
  • Secret
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • Wtf
  • Thanks Thanks:  0
    Likes Likes:  0
    Dislikes Dislikes:  0
    Results 1 to 3 of 3

    Thread: Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets

    1. #1
      Dr of Golf's Avatar
      Dr of Golf
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Default Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets



      • Get the Fitness Geared
        Forum App Now!
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets

      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      From this week's MEDSCAPE Medical News

      Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets

      News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
      Clinical Reviewer: Gary Vogin, MD
      CME Editor: Bernard M. Sklar, MD, MS



      April 8, 2003 — Low-carbohydrate diets have been all the rage lately, but a systematic review published in the April 9 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association reveals insufficient evidence to support or refute the concept thus far. The bottom line appears to be that a calorie is a calorie. The editorialist reviews the issue of adult weight loss.

      "Recently, low-carbohydrate diets have resurged in popularity as a means of rapid weight loss, yet their long-term efficacy and safety remain poorly understood," write Dena M. Bravata, MD, MS, from the Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research in Stamford, California, and colleagues. "Our results demonstrated the marked discordance between the knowledge needed to guide dietary choices and the information that is available in the medical literature."

      Although millions of copies of three books on low-carbohydrate diets have sold in the U.S. over the past five years, the American Dietetic Association, the American Heart Association, and other professional organizations have warned the public against potentially serious medical consequences of these diets.

      The investigators searched the literature for studies of low-carbohydrate diets published between 1966 and February 2003. They identified 107 articles reporting data on 3,268 participants, of whom 663 patients received lower-carbohydrate diets (60 grams of carbohydrates per day [g/d] or less), and 71 patients received the lowest-carbohydrate diets containing 20 g/d or less of carbohydrates, which is the recommended threshold for some of the most popular diets.

      None of the studies evaluated diets of 60 g/d or less of carbohydrates in subjects with a mean age older than 53 years, and only five studies evaluated these diets for more than 90 days. Weight loss in obese patients was associated with longer diet duration (P = .002) and restriction of calorie intake (P = .03), but not with reduced carbohydrate content. Low-carbohydrate diets had no significant adverse effects on serum lipid levels, fasting serum glucose levels, fasting serum insulin levels, or blood pressure.

      "Our quantitative synthesis...on the efficacy and safety of low-carbohydrate diets suggests that there is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against the use of these diets," the authors write. "We found insufficient evidence to conclude that lower-carbohydrate content is independently associated with greater weight loss compared with higher-carbohydrate content.... Given the limited evidence in this review, when lower-carbohydrate diets result in weight loss, it also is likely due to the restriction of calorie intake and longer duration rather than carbohydrate intake."

      The investigators recommend additional research evaluating the long-term effects and consequences of low-carbohydrate diets in both older and younger subjects with and without diabetes, high cholesterol, and hypertension.

      None of the authors has financial or other conflicts of interest concerning low-carbohydrate diets or diet projects. No manufacturer or vendor of dietary goods or services funded this study.

      In an accompanying editorial, George A. Bray, MD, from Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, notes that the worldwide epidemic of obesity will be followed by a worldwide epidemic of diabetes.

      "The broader issue of whether a unique diet exists that will produce long-term weight loss has yet to be evaluated," he writes. "Although the truth of 'a calorie is a calorie' has been reaffirmed by [this review], the question of whether patients can adhere more easily to one type of diet or another remains to be answered."

      JAMA. 2003;289:1837-1850, 1853-1855



      .

    2. #2
      pudgy's Avatar
      pudgy is offline Elite Senior Resident
      Points: 39,710, Level: 87
      Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 390
      Overall activity: 0%
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      Join Date
      Jan 2003
      Location
      Atlanta-ish
      Posts
      6,799
      Points
      39,710
      Level
      87
      Rep Power
      121

      Default

      it worked for me doc

    3. #3
      vibrantred94gt's Avatar
      vibrantred94gt is offline Rookie Member
      Points: 6,813, Level: 35
      Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 237
      Overall activity: 0%
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Posts
      54
      Points
      6,813
      Level
      35
      Rep Power
      86

      Default

      • Get the Fitness Geared
        Forum App Now!
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets

      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      • Little Evidence to Support Low-Carbohydrate Diets
      I replied to a post previous post about this subject. I don't care what anyone says, I have seen people eat way above the caloric intake and loose weight on the atkins.


      The fda and government is just working their way up to somthing....you figure it out.

      Dr. Atkins was a smart man!

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    Pro Wrists Straps
    Join us
    About us
    www.Fitnessgeared.com is a Bodybuilding Fitness health & Training Discussion forum for all levels from beginner to advanced. We offer everything from Nutrition, Supplements, Fat Loss, Weight Training, Dieting, to achieve your goals to get in the shape you want.