Romney secures front-runner status with New Hampshire win

[FUZO]

TweetMitt Romney scored a decisive victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday, securing his second win in the first two contests of the presidential nominating season and trying to turn his front-running campaign into a steamroller.






More...

[Dzone]

TweetWell, maybe this is good. You guys follow this stuff a lot more than I do any more, so what do you guys think of Romney? I want the guy that gives us the best shot against Obama. I trust the insight Fuzo and you other guys have on here. I wont be voting 3rd party like I did last time. We have to do everything we can to get Obama out. Hope and pray that someone steps up who is up to the challenge.

[bowbow]

TweetI would like to see Obama out as well but things will be no better with Romney.

[JsJs24]

Tweet

I would like to see Obama out as well but things will be no better with Romney.

You are exactly right bow bow. I just wish more people would look to the past records of the politicians in office and stop believing all of the rhetoric they speak on the campaign trail. Actions speak louder than words, but it's as if people don't remember actions, or forgive too easily for them. Romney has the most liberal record I know of, and yet Republicans are giving him a pass as if he didn't mean to govern like a Democrat. Well, we will get what we ask for if he wins. It seems like every election has been about electing the lesser of two evils. The party establishments put forth some candidates, only one of which they intend to give the nomination, then they tell the media to support them and tear down the others in hopes of a democratic process nominating them. However, when we don't like the one they intend to nominate it gets ugly, and they will do whatever necessary to see to it that they are on the ticket. This was also the case with John McCain. Those who follow politics closely and aren't biased realize hat he is one of the most progressive Republicans in politics, and had no chance of beating Obama, and yet that is who they nominated. It's almost as if they intended to give the presidency to a Democrat. One would have thought Huckabee would have been the one they should support if wanting to run a conservative and have any chance at winning. Well, now they have done it again, only this time they chose someone even more liberal if that is possible, and he also has to hope to win over the hard Christian right, which is not fond of Mormonism. Anyone from the south knows what I'm talking about. But suppose they do support him, we still have to wonder why the establishment keeps pushing liberal progressive so called Republicans on us. Has it dawned on anyone why the party is so disconnected? Has anyone wondered why the options are so similar, all of which have to explain their major flip flopping (except one) throughout their careers?

[BICEPBULG]

TweetI will vote for Ron Paul if he goes against Obama but if it's any of the others it will be Obama for me. I do research back and see what those politicians has done. Things are starting to turn around a little bit. It takes time. But I do like what Ron believes in. Everyone that says he scares them then they are on the wrong side of the fence. Honestly everything the media hyped about Obama has been false. We still got guns, ammo isn't taxed to death and I started a business with him in office. About to start another one. And with that said. I'm for better health care even if I have to pay for my employees. I know I might not be liked as well after this post but the only ones I seen hurting me is the republicans trying to keep Obama from doing anything. I'm sick of it. I don't think the others will have a chance. Ron Paul will start winning some states. Just wait.