Tweeti saw an explanation of what the deal was, apparently newt was and has been in favor of romney-care for decades, but, he has a clear line on it, it is a state issue and a state issue only, federal should stay out

his prob is in this media environment he will have a hard time with the distinction of the two

it's one of those things, since he was a big wig and a big talker he's got 100's of hours of video footage on policy positions, and he flip flops like dead fish, which means he's just bait for the media when they feel like it

ron paul is a long shot, yet, things right now are going in his favor, huck's our, trumps out, unless someone new jumps in you'll have a boring old white guy and ron paul

thus he will have opportunity to mega air time, so, if he messages correctly and not stupidly and sticks with simple themes, what is real freedom.........property rights, etc.

u will find this statement out there, yet, i have 3,000 books, studied all kinds of shyte, and imho one of the greatest discoveries in history is 0, zero, yes, zero

seems very odd right, well, math did not discover zero until like 1,300 AD, when it was discovered and implemented man now had the ability to measure and project things statistically on ifinite time lines with no boundaries

property rights is the corner stone of capitalism, property rights did not take hold as an idea until around 1,500...........which means the individual finally had some law on there side, before that it was all slavery, kings and queens, monarchs, dictators

so when american came to be in 1776 they used the latest and greatest best ideas, as if today u built a country all based on the internet

without the sanctity of property rights, the goverment can do wtf they want

Tweet

Originally Posted by trip

u will find this statement out there, yet, i have 3,000 books, studied all kinds of shyte, and imho one of the greatest discoveries in history is 0, zero, yes, zero

Trip you come up with some strange things...lol. Hey, have you ever heard of Bruce Mesquita? He is a political science professor at New York University. A guy I work with told me who he was today so I haven't done much research on him yet. Apparently he predicts future economic and political events using a mathematical formula. From what I have red so far it sounds like he is pretty accurate, and the CIA and Defense Department have both employed his services.

Back to the presidential race. Don't forget about Tim Pawlenty. He is probably going to go all the way to the primaries.

Tweet

Originally Posted by JsJs24

Trip you come up with some strange things...lol. Hey, have you ever heard of Bruce Mesquita? He is a political science professor at New York University. A guy I work with told me who he was today so I haven't done much research on him yet. Apparently he predicts future economic and political events using a mathematical formula. From what I have red so far it sounds like he is pretty accurate, and the CIA and Defense Department have both employed his services.

Back to the presidential race. Don't forget about Tim Pawlenty. He is probably going to go all the way to the primaries.

No, i have not heard of Bruce Mesquita, I've read half a dozen books on the subject. It seems once computers were more abundant on college campuses in the 1970' alot of mathematical formulating was done on everything.

I kept like two of those books and reread one a year ago. They are all imho fairly simple, x number of people, y number of resources....(several categories), z amount of clean water, plus amount of garbage produced

They all show very wide outcomes based on doing something at certain inflection points.

IMHO, i think your right on paw paw, something kind of bugs me about him

Tweet

Originally Posted by trip

No, i have not heard of Bruce Mesquita, I've read half a dozen books on the subject. It seems once computers were more abundant on college campuses in the 1970' alot of mathematical formulating was done on everything.

I kept like two of those books and reread one a year ago. They are all imho fairly simple, x number of people, y number of resources....(several categories), z amount of clean water, plus amount of garbage produced

They all show very wide outcomes based on doing something at certain inflection points.

IMHO, i think your right on paw paw, something kind of bugs me about him

This guy apparently accurately predicted the president of Russia once, and it was a man nobody had heard of. I haven't checked him out completely but his formula is proprietary.

What do you mean about paw paw. I have not said anything negative about Ron Paul. I just said he won't win because he is not corrupt or corruptible.