TweetCheck out this video where Paul tells Conway to stand up and be a man. EXCELLENT!!!!!!

https://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43741.html

TweetThat was awesome Dzone

TweetExactly! word Rand. I would love to see him take on Weiner's weasely ass. That little ***** Anthoney Weiner would have to pipe down with that smug bs he throws out there.
One of Weiner's statements, "I wrote the entire healthcare bill. I am the healthcare bill. The bill and I are one." yeah...I can't stand that little shit, and would enjoy watching Rand Paul pick his gimlet ass apart.

TweetThis is one way that he's different than his father. Ron is a bit more reserved and doesn't particularly like confrontation, he's a bit more subtle. Rand is swinging. I loved when he told Conway that he was an embarrassment.

TweetNow if you guys would watch a bunch of Ron Paul videos, notably those where he talks about economics and the fed, you will most likely find that he is a great man too that represents what is best for liberty. The two are very similar in their views, Rand being more conservative than Ron Paul, but I bet deep down they agree on most everything.

TweetI think one reason Ron is so reserved is simply because of his beliefs. His belief in The Contstitution and absolute liberty. In his mind, speculating of course, his notion of how things are supposed to be leads him to accept whacko politicos bs on Ron's belief in their liberty to be fuked up politicians. know what I mean?..me neither.
His son definitely doesn't seem to let the bullshit slip by him though. On any premise. It's okay to have a messed up view, I guess...but not here. And damn sure not in a government position.

Tweet

Originally Posted by horsepwr

I think one reason Ron is so reserved is simply because of his beliefs. His belief in The Contstitution and absolute liberty. In his mind, speculating of course, his notion of how things are supposed to be leads him to accept whacko politicos bs on Ron's belief in their liberty to be fuked up politicians. know what I mean?..me neither.
His son definitely doesn't seem to let the bullshit slip by him though. On any premise. It's okay to have a messed up view, I guess...but not here. And damn sure not in a government position.

Uh, no, I'm not sure I know what you mean. At any rate, Ron Paul's views are not extreme at all, he merely understands better than most anyone in the country what the founders intended our government to be. People say he is extreme in his views but that is not how I see it. He wants the Federal Government to be limited to protecting our rights, property, and security, and for states to retain all rights not delegated to the Federal Government nor prohibited from the states respectively. You really should read up on Paul, or read one of his books, or at least watch as many youtube videos as you can of him. I was not a Ron Paul fan until a couple years ago, mostly because I only saw snippets of him speaking and thought he was extreme minded. Well, I finally decided to seek out and find everything I could from him to determine base my opinion. The result was obviously that I am a huge fan, and believe there has never been a politician on par with him since the days of Thomas Jefferson in office. My brother, who has been a life long conservative Republican did the same after I recommended him to, and likewise he is a Ron Paul fan now as well. I promise you it takes a lot for me to respect a politician because I feel most of them are the lowest scum on earth. Well, there are a few good ones, not many at all, but there are a few, and Paul is one of them.

Tweet

Originally Posted by JsJs24

Uh, no, I'm not sure I know what you mean. At any rate, Ron Paul's views are not extreme at all, he merely understands better than most anyone in the country what the founders intended our government to be. People say he is extreme in his views but that is not how I see it. He wants the Federal Government to be limited to protecting our rights, property, and security, and for states to retain all rights not delegated to the Federal Government nor prohibited from the states respectively. You really should read up on Paul, or read one of his books, or at least watch as many youtube videos as you can of him. I was not a Ron Paul fan until a couple years ago, mostly because I only saw snippets of him speaking and thought he was extreme minded. Well, I finally decided to seek out and find everything I could from him to determine base my opinion. The result was obviously that I am a huge fan, and believe there has never been a politician on par with him since the days of Thomas Jefferson in office. My brother, who has been a life long conservative Republican did the same after I recommended him to, and likewise he is a Ron Paul fan now as well. I promise you it takes a lot for me to respect a politician because I feel most of them are the lowest scum on earth. Well, there are a few good ones, not many at all, but there are a few, and Paul is one of them.

I agree completely. There is nothing wrong with being extreme though. It just depends on what you're so passionate about. Ron Paul is indeed extreme in his beliefs, I hope. I hope he's not just another snake-oil guy. I don't believe he is though. Thomas Jefferson was extreme in his beliefs. Thank God. Without the extreme nature of our founding fathers, we likely would not even be mentioning their names, or even sitting in this country.

The media and politicians have created a negative view of the word "extreme". Nothing wrong with it.

Tweet

Originally Posted by horsepwr

I agree completely. There is nothing wrong with being extreme though. It just depends on what you're so passionate about. Ron Paul is indeed extreme in his beliefs, I hope. I hope he's not just another snake-oil guy. I don't believe he is though. Thomas Jefferson was extreme in his beliefs. Thank God. Without the extreme nature of our founding fathers, we likely would not even be mentioning their names, or even sitting in this country.

The media and politicians have created a negative view of the word "extreme". Nothing wrong with it.

Ron Paul is actually not extreme. What I meant was that when I saw snippets of him I did not get to hear his entire view on things, and only got the typical Fox News bashing of him. Once people understand liberty and the founders real intentions, they will realize that Ron Paul merely supports a Jeffersonian approach to government. He just wants a limited government with equal liberty for all. His view on War is precisely how the founders viewed it but that doesn't seem to matter these days because nobody in politics gives a damn what the founders believed.

TweetJs, The adjective "extreme" isn't only what it's became to be by the media. They've made it a bad thing. As if by being extreme in your belief is automatically a negative trait. That's bs. Ron Paul is indeed extreme by several definitions of the word.

Here: extreme-

–adjective
1. of a character or kind farthest removed from the ordinary or average: extreme measures.
2. utmost or exceedingly great in degree: extreme joy.
3. farthest from the center or middle; outermost; endmost: the extreme limits of a town.
4. farthest, utmost, or very far in any direction: an object at the extreme point of vision.
5. exceeding the bounds of moderation: extreme fashions.
6. going to the utmost or very great lengths in action, habit, opinion, etc.: an extreme conservative.

Ron Paul is indeed extreme by several difinitions of the adjective. Same with Jefferson.
I call them extreme, proudly, because they are 100% in their belief without compromise. extreme. Damn fine quality in the proper areas such as these 2 guys in context. There's nothing wrong with calling it like it is. The brilliant media, and government has damned the term, but I got tired of the government word games long ago. Sure, some Muslim terrorist are extreme as well. While still fitting the difintion of extreme, people have let their "extremist" label completely taint the one word description.
If you're blowing shit up in the name of alah. Then the 'extreme' label can leave a sour impression. If you're going hard for The Republic, liberties, and ways of our fonders,*without compromise, such as Jefferson & Paul. Then that's extremely nobel, and simply extreme by defintion, definition #6 fits well Ron Paul and Jefferson, and there is nothing wrong with deserving that label.
We need an entire government that's extreme in Paul and Jefferson's way 100% without the bs compromises of our current passive phlegmatics that have, likely, never owned an extreme feeling in their life. moderate.-That's a great way to be accordong to the government and media. Bulllshit again. Moderate is a spineless politician that bends over against his beliefs. We need to rid our government of moderates without conviction. We need a governing body of extremist to the enth degree. Extreme in their belief in The Republic. Extreme in their belief in The Contitution. Extreme in their beliefs and moral convictions. Ron Paul fits this description. Ron Paul is indeed extreme.

Tweet

Originally Posted by horsepwr

Js, The adjective "extreme" isn't only what it's became to be by the media. They've made it a bad thing. As if by being extreme in your belief is automatically a negative trait. That's bs. Ron Paul is indeed extreme by several definitions of the word.

Here: extreme-

–adjective
1. of a character or kind farthest removed from the ordinary or average: extreme measures.
2. utmost or exceedingly great in degree: extreme joy.
3. farthest from the center or middle; outermost; endmost: the extreme limits of a town.
4. farthest, utmost, or very far in any direction: an object at the extreme point of vision.
5. exceeding the bounds of moderation: extreme fashions.
6. going to the utmost or very great lengths in action, habit, opinion, etc.: an extreme conservative.

Ron Paul is indeed extreme by several difinitions of the adjective. Same with Jefferson.
I call them extreme, proudly, because they are 100% in their belief without compromise. extreme. Damn fine quality in the proper areas such as these 2 guys in context. There's nothing wrong with calling it like it is. The brilliant media, and government has damned the term, but I got tired of the government word games long ago. Sure, some Muslim terrorist are extreme as well. While still fitting the difintion of extreme, people have let their "extremist" label completely taint the one word description.
If you're blowing shit up in the name of alah. Then the 'extreme' label can leave a sour impression. If you're going hard for The Republic, liberties, and ways of our fonders,*without compromise, such as Jefferson & Paul. Then that's extremely nobel, and simply extreme by defintion, definition #6 fits well Ron Paul and Jefferson, and there is nothing wrong with deserving that label.
We need an entire government that's extreme in Paul and Jefferson's way 100% without the bs compromises of our current passive phlegmatics that have, likely, never owned an extreme feeling in their life. moderate.-That's a great way to be accordong to the government and media. Bulllshit again. Moderate is a spineless politician that bends over against his beliefs. We need to rid our government of moderates without conviction. We need a governing body of extremist to the enth degree. Extreme in their belief in The Republic. Extreme in their belief in The Contitution. Extreme in their beliefs and moral convictions. Ron Paul fits this description. Ron Paul is indeed extreme.

I suppose in that context he is extreme. Now stop giving me grammar lessons horsepwr...lol.