WHO WOULD YOU

[FUZO]

TweetRATHER HAVE IN OFFICE CLINTON OR OBAMA. I WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT HOW SCREWED THE REP ARE BUT I WOULD HAVE NOW GOD KNOWS I CANT BELEIVE I'M SAYING THIS BUT CLINTON. THE ONLY REASON IS SHE HAS BILL ON HER SIDE AND HE ALREADY HAS 8 YRS IN S PRES.A WOMEN IN OFFICE OMG. NOW TAKE NO OFFENSE LADIES BUT CMON HILLARY, YOU KNOW HOW THE OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD WOULD THINK WE ARE A JOKE WITH A FEMALE RUNNING THE USA. THEY WOULDNT RESPECT HER

[BigDawg]

Tweeti gotta say Obama even though i'm republican. McCain is too damn old at 77. and with his meddling recently into sports and doping and wanting answers, no thanks. Hillary, no. A woman president would be just fine. except for the backassward phuqing arab world no one would think we're weak with a woman president. but did you see her tear up and cry twice last week??? not from some sad world situation but because of criticism of her statements about LBJ vs MLK doing more for civil rights and her being taken to task about it and then when she lost one of the primaries to Obama she started crying again. THAT is something that shows she wouldn't have the composure to handle a truly stressful situation politically in this country.

[Merc]

Tweetif hilary is in office I think it might be smart to move to canada. She scares me to much

[Deno]

TweetSome fortune teller said OBAMA will win it all. Take it for what its worth..

[Klash]

TweetIMO, McCain is more dangerous than either of those two as a threat to individual liberty.

I will vote for the Libertarian candidate; which has asked Ron Paul to run as their candidate if he doesn't get the nomination for the Republican party but whether he accepts or not, I will vote for the Libertarian candidate.

But to answer your question between Obama and Hillary. I think I would rather have Hillary simply because you know her positions, you know her ideology. Obama would be exposing many of his beliefs, as president, for the first time - that is a pretty big risk, so I think I would default to Hillary.

[T-Man007]

TweetObama- you have no idea what you will get.

Clinton- hell no, she's a loose cannon and I agree, the rest of the world would see us as weak. Name one majorcountry with a woman running it.......that's what I thought. We would be a joke and no one would take her seriously. We all know her husband was a totaly puss when he pulled out of Bosnia and she would be an even bigger anti-war person. Conclusion....more attacks on the US, plain and simple. Why do you think we have had no more major attacks? Because Bush will respond with force. As soon as an anti-war dem gets in office, it's game on for these terrorists. You disagree, just wait and see.

[Klash]

TweetMargaret Thatcher - United Kingdom was respeced.

I don't think a women will give America a weak perception, it's the ideology associated with Hillary that will make us be percieved as weak.

Someone like Ayn Rand, would scare the $hit out of anyone wanting to mess with us.

You disagree, just wait and see.

LOL! I think your right - unfortunately!

[Caddyman]

TweetObama, i wouldn't have a women as president, ever....

[BIGMOFO]

Tweeti would vote for byron to be prez before obama..if he gets it we all are in TROUBLE!!!

[Caddyman]

Tweethow so mofo?

for the record, im not a obama supporter either...both dems IMO aren't great choice. i do enjoy political debate though

[solidground]

Tweetid say obama eventhough my political opinions are way different then his i think for the most part his intentions are good, hillary on the otherhand is way more 'owned" and imo evil..Obama is a great speaker and would be a great leader if he didnt have loyalties to the establishment.

Ive been saying this for years though, i think hillary will be our next president- BC SHES A CLINTON=NWO=CFR

[daved150]

Tweet

Margaret Thatcher - United Kingdom was respeced.

I don't think a women will give America a weak perception, it's the ideology associated with Hillary that will make us be percieved as weak.

Someone like Ayn Rand, would scare the $hit out of anyone wanting to mess with us.



LOL! I think your right - unfortunately!

i agree with klash...the woman thing dont really bother me. it's THAT woman that bothers me!! i dont know...why do i got to pick??!!
I'm going lib!!

[pigmeat]

Tweeti dont want either of those creeps in office

[supasaiyan99]

Tweet

Obama- you have no idea what you will get.

Clinton- hell no, she's a loose cannon and I agree, the rest of the world would see us as weak. Name one majorcountry with a woman running it.......that's what I thought. We would be a joke and no one would take her seriously. We all know her husband was a totaly puss when he pulled out of Bosnia and she would be an even bigger anti-war person. Conclusion....more attacks on the US, plain and simple. Why do you think we have had no more major attacks? Because Bush will respond with force. As soon as an anti-war dem gets in office, it's game on for these terrorists. You disagree, just wait and see.

Well actually if you look at the leaders of the Great 8 summit, the poliical leader for Germany is a woman by the name of Angela Merkel. I think Hilary would do fine. I voted for her in the FL Primary.