TweetI`m sorry to chime in on this but frankly Ice cubes and global polar caps are NOT THE SAME THING.
If you believe that global warming is not real then Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and every other part of the matrix did it`s job. Period.
Gentlemen, we must be careful to destinguish real science from courtroom science. Real science is detailed and difficult to understand and impossible to refute because it is based on physical law. Courtroom science tries to confuse the juror by giving non-applicable examples that sound right but aren`t scientifically applicable to the origional case.
Ice cubes in a glass of water and glaicers on a mountain side ARE NOT REMOTELY CONNECTED except for that ice is involved in both.
Does Co2 react with our atmosphere in a negative manner? Yes
Can ozone levels be tracked? Yes
Are ozone holes growing in size? Yes
Does the burning of carbon based fuels (gasoline, etc.) create Co2? Yes
I`m sorry to say it so stongly but science proved global warming about 30 years ago. The only stuff that`s come out since has been industry comercials (desigused as science). If you believed the commercials, I could hardly blame you, they paid millions to make them work. But the fact remains: global warming is real.
SD