Originally Posted by
TexSon
what'd he say?
kiddin.
I got it nips....voodoo.
steroids are voodoo. nothing new there. biochemistry of each individual and the way it will react to any given substance is always....well, voodoo.
still, there are generalities that apply, and in regards to tren....dude, the verdict is in - been in a long time ago.
trenbolone + liver toxicity = na ga happen.
but, here is another take on the matter - the f'ing butt loads of high dollar, tax dollar I might add, tests the government has compiled, and again, butt loads on the topic of feed efficiency.
bare with me here.
in other words - beef feeds the masses and is important to the well being of this country.
given this fact, you have the cattle industry, whose main concern is cost vs return on investment.
in other words, how much will a cattleman earn from the sale of a cow versus how much it cost to feed him.
I know what your thinking - fk, tex.....wtf are you talking about.
about this - massive studies have been done on trenbolone by our government on behalf of the cattle industry, and its been done at prohibitive costs involving some of the finest minds around.
feeding the people of this nation is a far greater matter to the trenbolone industry than how big nips biceps are.
I've read a good deal of this documentation for a few different reasons and I can tell you that in no given instance within these white papers did they ever mention any physical abnormalities in the cattle whatsoever. not in blood chemistry, muscle fiber construction, kidneys, liver, tendon ailments....nothing.
granted, this is cattle, not humans...still, it supports the idea that trenbolone, as a steroid, given for increase in lean muscle mass is a fairly innocuous compound.
and just like the creatine stories, so you will have the trenbolone stories.
remember - trenbolone's #1 use in this country is cattle related.
its all there under the department of argricultures archives if anyone is interested.